alt.politics.economics

Paul Thomas wrote:
> "Mark M." wrote
>
>>Where? Post what he said so we can have a look.

So why did you cut out what I wrote if you want to compare them?

Why are you constant playing games by deleting relevant stuff? Why the juvenile
repartee? It seems you are interested in some kind of point scoring rather than
fruitful discussion.

Mark M.

> "Paul Thomas, CPA" wrote on
> Saturday, October 06, 2007 @ 11:57 AM
>
>>Which is far from allowing anyone and everyone to use the land, as that
>>individual sees fit, with impunity. And you know that, or should.
>>
>>Government owned resources are very common. Even allowing "free" access
>>to certain resources is common. But even in those cases, there are no
>>rights for individuals to use those resources as they see fit, without
>>running afoul of the government who controls at that point, your use and
>>enjoyment.
>>
>>Take a National Park as an example. You are free (subject to some access
>>fee) to enjoy it or not, but you aren't free to hunt, fish, cut timber,
>>mine the resources, build a home, etc and so on. Again, you may be
>>permitted, subject to additional fees, to do so, but if you didn't get
>>that permission to do so, and you did, it's not without impunity.
>
>
>
>
>
> You and roy must be cousins.
>
>
>