alt.politics.economics

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:34:52 -0500, lysander@ wrote:

> The Trucker wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 01:47:00 -0500, lysander@ wrote:
>>
>>> The Trucker wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:00:55 -0500, lysander@ wrote:
>>>>
>
>>>>> Again this is not present value as claimed it is. It is current value of
>>>>> the rent discounted by interest and taxes.
>>>> That is true.
>>>>
>>> Nice working cutting the part were you asked me to show why this was not
>>> present value and where you claimed it was.
>>
>> I have given the current/present discounted value
>
> current/present value? Current value and present value are two distinct
> concepts not the same. Learn some economics before you post drivel like
> this.

Learn some reality. The presentation is reality based, as opposed to
being belly button lent.

/essays/

>>> Nice argument. We still have no defense as to why you think the formula
>>> is right.
>>
>> It amortizes the present value of future rents to 30 years.
>
> This is not amortization either.

Your opinions no longer have any merit, Bozo Butt. The formula and
the numbers reflect reality. Your stunted vocabulary only reflects some
sort of religious indoctrination; at best an exercise in masturbation.

--
"I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers
of society but the people themselves; and
if we think them not enlightened enough to
exercise their control with a wholesome
discretion, the remedy is not to take it from
them, but to inform their discretion by
education." - Thomas Jefferson