Group: sci.research.careers
From: Straydog
Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 6:39 AM
Subject: Re: So nanotechnoloyg is dead? ...was: Re: Two Bioenergy Faculty Positions


I edited out the other NGs... see below....

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Erdemal wrote:

> Beladi Nasralla wrote:
>> On Oct 10, 5:20 pm, "zzbun...@ "
>> wrote:
>>> On Oct 10, 4:14 am, Beladi Nasralla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Oct 10, 11:03 am, "zzbun...@ "
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 9, 8:49 am, Straydog wrote:
>>>>>> And, did everyone notice where this is happening? And, notice the part
>>>>>> about funding? And, also that it is NOT in India?
>>>>> Well, no. Since it it never even started outside of a much of
>>>>> academic whitepapers and demo experiments, like
>>>>> everything the idiot US science community does.
>>>>> So it's mostly one of things that the US R&D
>>>>> community mostly said:
>>>>> "Take it to India, since we've already reached our
>>>>> infinite patience limit fucking around with IBM morons".
>>>> The Russian President Putin has pledged to finance the new hub in
>>>> nanotechnology. This is supposed to take the country to the new
>>>> economic-political level.
>>>> However, as someone put it, "He is going to staff the nanotechnology
>>>> program with megafools", as the modern young people do not like to
>>>> study and work hard.
>>> That's true, for a new reason.
>>> There's not much reason reason to study nano-tech, which you have
>>> 1000 GHz of fiber optic tech to spare.
>>
>> I am sure nobody else understood what you meant, either.
>>
>
> I did. He meant that with a nano reason one can ride at 1000 GHz
> a strait optic fiber thus China and India can maybe tomorow.
>
> Erdy
>

I did not understand what ZZ wrote, either, and the sentence by "Erdy"
is...well...just as bad.

No wonder our society is going to hell; people can't read, can't think,
can't write.